Table. 1.

Baseline characteristics of the included studies

Author Year Country Journal Design Included population Sample size Pancreas-enteric anastomosis technique
Total Robotic Laparoscopic Hybrid laparoscopic–robotic Open
Ajay et al. [15] 2023 USA J Surg Oncol Retrospective observational Patients undergoing central pancreatectomy 18 8 0 0 10 Open: pancreatogastrostomy
Robotic: pancreatogastrostomy
Wang et al. [16] 2024 Taiwan Int J Med Robot Retrospective observational Patients undergoing central pancreatectomy 31 14 0 0 17 Open: pancreaticojejunostomy
Robotic: pancreaticojejunostomy
Yang et al. [17] 2023 China Langenbecks Arch Surg Retrospective observational Patients undergoing central pancreatectomy 33 0 12 0 21 Open: pancreaticojejunostomy
Laparoscopic: pancreaticojejunostomy
Huynh et al. [18] 2022 Korea Surg Endosc Retrospective observational Patients undergoing central pancreatectomy 31 7 4 9 11 Open: pancreaticojejunostomy or pancreatogastrostomy
Laparoscopic: pancreaticojejunostomy
Robotic: pancreaticojejunostomy or pancreatogastrostomy
Zhang et al. [19] 2017 China Surg Endosc Retrospective observational Patients undergoing central pancreatectomy 36 0 17 0 19 Open: pancreaticojejunostomy
Laparoscopic: pancreaticojejunostomy
Chen et al. [20] 2017 China Surg Endosc Randomized controlled trial Patients undergoing central pancreatectomy 100 50 0 0 50 Open: pancreatogastrostomy
Robotic: pancreatogastrostomy
Song et al. [21] 2015 Korea Surg Endosc Retrospective observational Patients undergoing central pancreatectomy 40 0 26 0 14 Open: pancreaticojejunostomy
Laparoscopic: pancreaticojejunostomy
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2024;28:412-22 https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.24-093
© 2024 Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg